industrial+revolution

Video 1 summary : Maio, Andy, Kim Some of the pictures were off center, and you couldn't see them very well. Like how alot of the pictures were drawn or written themselves, even though many of the pictures were printed out. I think they did a very good job of saying everything they needed to say, and I felt like they had an understanding of what they did. Also they had everything ready to go and there weren't any pauses.

Video 2 summary: Roxy immaculate william and annie The pictures were small, but you could still see them clearly and they read them out loud so you could know what they said. ALL the pictures were drawn and i thought that was really nice, shows a lot of craftsmenship and that they were proud of what they did, and they took a lot of time to do it, too. Theirs went reallly fast too everything was welll planned out and in order.

VIdeo 3 summary : MINEEEEE !

Video 4 summary: stanley andrea jaclyn Most of their pictures were printed off the computer, didn't draw them theirselves. Overall they did a really good job, everything was clear and i had no problem understanding what they were trying to say. I wouldve liked to see a little more creativity though. More people had time to play sports and see shows, rather than work in a factory or something.

Video 5 summary : Stephane jereamy juan and alex Once again alot of the pictures were printed out, not drawn. The person speaking (juan) did a really good job, everything was clear, and didn't speak to fast. Pretty much everything they were saying was accurate and i don't see any problems with it, they're dialouge went well with the pictures they were showing us, and the facts they were saying were very interesting. Maybe a ltitle more color would've been nice, to make things stand out more.

Video 6 summary: harout taryn sarah chris The video was upside down, but from what I can see everything was very discriptive and would've been very good if it was rightside up. As the video goes on the pictures seem like theyre turning. I liked everything they had to say everything, it was interesting and historicallly correct from what i know. They had a lot of key names and people in their discussion too.

=DIRECT DEMOCRACY= Basically a direct democracy is when everyone in the state votes on everything, and nothing is allowed unless it's agreed on. no country has a complete direct democracy. strengths: everyone gets to vote. weeknesses: not everyone gets what they want, not everyone is happy. it would take too long do vote on EVERYTHING.